NUTRITION FACTS DELAYED:
WHY UPDATING IS STILL A GREAT STRATEGY
MANUFACTURER’S BENEFITS TO UPDATING ASAP
- Fresher & healthier product – In 1990, the first mandatory FDA Nutrition Facts panel regulations were released. When the first new labels made store shelf we found those sold much better than products with updated labels. The Kraft salad dressings had a new design with contemporary photography, so one may have thought the design was the major reason consumers preferred items with new labels. The Seven Seas and Good Seasons also had increased sales, but their only difference was the nutrition facts panel. Consumer insight studies revealed that the thicker, bolder type in Nutrition Facts was the main visual driving purchasing decisions. The perception was that updated nutrition panels contain product fresh from the factory, and reformulation to meet newer healthier standards.
- Brand building – The consumers first encounter with the new nutrition facts is met with curiosity and enthusiasm for something developed to benefit them. When a new restaurant opens in your neighborhood customers swarm to try something new. Updated labeling on grocery products also captures and stimulates consumer purchasing. The brand builds consumer confidence and offers a sense of security that the product they are purchasing is from a progressive and knowledgeable manufacturer.
- Press schedule and pricing – Lead times for going to print will become longer and more expensive once everyone updates their labeling to make the deadline. Many are holding off on updating now as they are waiting for the controversial genetic engineering labeling and the USDA Nutrition panels. With the deadline extension, now can be a great time to update depending on your product.
- Ahead of the competition – Consumers have options and smallest difference can influence purchasing choices. The larger type for calorie amount will be the strongest and quickest visual indication that this product is new. Brands that first initiate the new nutrition facts panels on shelf are perceived as leaders, innovators and advancing ahead of their competition.
- Low Fat Claims – Your daily value percentage for total fat will be lower, and you may qualify for fat claims you did not before.
- Achieving compliance – You may have many SKUs to update and trying to do all in the last year before deadline may be too much. Being focused and delegating proper resources will allow for more discovery of strategic opportunities and proper reformulation to make the most out of this relabel and redesign.
Important issues to consider prior to updating:
DAILY VALUES ARE CHANGING
One cannot insert the same values from an existing nutrition facts panel into the new format. In addition to stringent typographical changes, the FDA has changed the actual recommended values of nutrients. At Kaleidoscope we confirm the nutritionals submitted to us have been updated to ensure the panel is compliant with the new FDA update.
The total amount of fats consumed daily for example has actually increased by 20% on the new nutrition facts panel. For many years we have been told fats are unhealthy, and we switched to low fat food. The problem is that we cut back on healthy fats along with the harmful ones. Fats are a major source of energy and helps you absorb vitamins and minerals.
RACC ARE CHANGING
The reference amount customarily consumed (RACC) determines the serving size. Manufacturers often feel more comfortable using the word “about” X servings so they are not accused of overstating their servings per package. The truth is, the FDA prefers to not use “about” as the serving size is rounded and instead prefer consumer confidence in the nutritional panel. The FDA has removed the word “about” in all their examples and also use consumer friendly household measures such as cup or slice, as preferred by the FDA.
Products packaged in a form that promotes consumption in one sitting are required to be labeled as one serving (eg: 20oz soda bottle). Products that contain greater than twice the RACC but less than or equal to three times the RACC are required to list both the per serving and package in a dual column format. Serving sizes have been updated to better reflect what people actually consume in one sitting. Most products remain the same, but these have also been updated.
IMPACT ON NON-FDA/USDA ITEMS
Nutritional labeling of alcohol has been banned up until 2013. Since the BATF split and the TTB took over liquor labeling, they have been proactive and providing us better labeling guidelines.
SUGARS, VEGETABLES & PACKAGE SIZE
The nutrition facts now require the daily value percentage of added sugars on the label, and this will eventually bring about a harsh reality to consumers about their eating habits. Package sizes affect how people eat—Per container values will now additionally need to be added in a dual column format when the package size is between one and two servings. A 20oz bottle of cola or a pint of ice cream could shockingly be over 100% the daily value to total sugars.
The fast food industry is especially guilty of too much sugar, sodium and few vegetables. At Kaleidoscope, we have already updated many labels to the new format, but understandably no requests have come for items high in sugars such as cookies and ice cream. Consumers though need the truth to make better choices, and this will drive better options for brands to evolve. People will likely continue to sugar consumption beyond the daily value, but updating to the new nutrition panel will likely change some habits.
The labeling of whether a product contains GE ingredients, is assigned to the USDA, and will soon become a topic of much debate as there are numerous problems with labeling GE.
The first being that no effects on human health have been shown as a result of the consumption of genetically engineered foods. Many studies have been performed on GE, most with the intention of discrediting usage.
Secondly, the concern is in how accurate GE labeling will actually be. GE labeling for the most part will attempt to target substances that have been modified using recombinant in vitro DNA techniques. Cross pollination, modifications made by nature, logistics, and record keeping make identifying everything that is GE difficult. Our vegetable oils often come from GE soybeans, and the USDA is unsure if that will need to be disclosed,. This is only one amongst many other related issues that need addressing.
Thirdly, GE labeling is a cost that ultimately will likely be passed onto the consumer. The consumer has a right to know that the price of products may go up to pay for expensive GMO certifications and the manufacturers cost of relabeling.